In the first half of this two-part article, we analyzed a cognitivepsychology experiment where participants were asked to select pairs ofdirections that they considered to be the best example of 'Two Different WindDirections', and showed that the data violate the CHSH version of Bell'sinequality, with same magnitude as in typical Bell-test experiments in physics.In this second part, we complete our analysis by presenting a symmetrizedversion of the experiment, still violating the CHSH inequality but now alsoobeying the marginal law, for which we provide a full quantum modeling inHilbert space, using a singlet state and suitably chosen product measurements.We also address some of the criticisms that have been recently directed atexperiments of this kind, according to which they would not highlight thepresence of genuine forms of entanglement. We explain that these criticisms arebased on a view of entanglement that is too restrictive, thus unable to captureall possible ways physical and conceptual entities can connect and form systemsbehaving as a whole. We also provide an example of a mechanical model showingthat the violations of the marginal law and Bell inequalities are generally tobe associated with different mechanisms.
展开▼
